How to interpret SocialFi data? Three core indicators help you distinguish between genuine and false activity. User behavior and interaction retention → Check if there is "true social interaction." On-chain content transactions and tips → Check if the content has "real value." Economic models and incentive design → Check if the system can be "truly sustainable." Truly promising SocialFi is not a bustling "mutual following platform," but a genuinely valuable exchange and content monetization mechanism in an on-chain social network.
The core of SocialFi is "social + finance." Many projects may seem to have a lot of users and high popularity, but when you break down the data, you'll find it's all about mutual following, inflated numbers, and short-term exploitation. What data truly reflects user quality, content value, and economic sustainability? Let's break down the project data of SocialFi together.
1. Looking at popularity? Better to look at "real activity."#
User count is the entry point, but you can't just look at "registered users" or "post volume." The value of SocialFi lies in community activity and content influence, not merely in the number of users.
What to look at?
Daily active users/Weekly active users (DAU/WAU): Measure the scale of truly active users.
Content output frequency: Total posts per day vs. daily new user count.
Interaction rate (comments/likes/shares): Average interactions per piece of content.
User retention rate: Retention curves for the next day, 7 days, and 30 days to see platform stickiness.
Recommended tools:
DappRadar: View user numbers, transaction counts, interaction frequency, etc.
Footprint Analytics: Conduct retention analysis and behavior mapping.
Dune Analytics: Build dashboards for interaction rates, content publishing trends, etc.
Tip: Don't be misled by slogans like "XX project has over a million users." Break down the data: Are they "creators" who post daily, or just "users" who come to invite a few people for airdrops and leave?
2. On-chain interaction data: Is the content being "truly read" and "truly used"?#
SocialFi is not just about posting; its content can be monetized. Users post content, tip content, and purchase influence—these actions are traceable on-chain, and where there is data, there is truth.
What to look at?
Content tipping/transaction counts: Are people paying for content?
Circulation of NFT content: Has the content become an asset that circulates?
Are interaction behaviors recorded on-chain: Are likes and follows real transactions, or are they centralized backend fake data?
Repetition of tipping/sharing addresses: Is it all reliant on internal cycles of fake users inflating data?
Recommended tools:
Zerion / DeBank: Check the content interaction history of specific wallets.
Nansen (paid): Identify whether "smart addresses" frequently participate in content transactions.
Dune: View data dashboards for content transaction frequency, tipping models, etc.
Tip: Whether content can be monetized is a core indicator of whether SocialFi possesses "content financial value." Monetizable content ≠ inflated numbers; it means real people are "paying for creation."
3. Social economic model: Is there positive incentive design?#
Most SocialFi projects will issue tokens and create reputation systems, but are these incentive mechanisms designed to "encourage quality content" or "encourage mutual following and support"? The key lies in the design of the economic model.
What to look at?
Token issuance logic: Is it "more content equals more tokens," or is "influence + interaction quality" determining rewards?
Token utility: What can you do with the tokens? Can they be used for platform value enhancement, upgrades, or content publishing?
Anti-bot mechanisms: Are there measures to prevent inflated numbers, fake accounts, and exploitation?
Pathways for content on-chain and NFTization: Can content be verified, traded, and collateralized?
Recommended tools:
Official white papers + TokenUnlocks: Check token release and utility.
Messari: Analyze the economic design of well-known SocialFi projects.
Dune dashboards: Analyze the coordination of on-chain interaction data and token issuance rhythm.
Tip: If a platform only rewards "posting more" or "following more," without any mechanism for "content quality assessment," that system will quickly collapse, leading to poor quality, rapid inflation, and user attrition.
Summary: How to interpret SocialFi data? Three core indicators help you distinguish between genuine and false activity.#
User behavior and interaction retention → Check if there is "true social interaction."
On-chain content transactions and tips → Check if the content has "real value."
Economic models and incentive design → Check if the system can be "truly sustainable."
Truly promising SocialFi is not a bustling "mutual following platform," but a genuinely valuable exchange and content monetization mechanism in an on-chain social network.
Welcome to join the community
Welcome to join the community WeChat: BQ221858
Welcome to follow Weibo: @QuarkMing202
Welcome to follow Twitter: @xian202766693